| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
   |
Posted - 2011.08.19 07:20:00 -
[1]
POST HERE EVERY TIME YOU DIED BECAUSE OF AN AFK CLOAKER. LET'S TRY TO GET SOME STATISTICS TOGETHER.
The correct term is REMOTE PEBCAK CLOAKING but you may not realise this.
Time to see just how big of an issue this really is.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:03:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Miss Rabblt
...This is 2 cases when people whine about afk and when afk cloaker really hurts people.
You can't go to another system. To mine you need move your ships and hauling. To do PI.... :D
Feel free to post any concrete examples rather than theory.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:34:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Miss Rabblt
Originally by: Jemima Puddle****
Feel free to post any concrete examples rather than theory.
you want to gather some tears? do it yourself 
This is an intel gathering thread. My statistics alone are not going to prove anything.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 10:11:00 -
[4]
Please stay on topic people. There are plenty of whine threads to discuss theory in. This thread is for evidence indicating just how often this happens. I do not want to have to stary reporting all the off topic posters that can't undertsand this.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 10:33:00 -
[5]
But... That's almost like you are in control of their space, in your frig!
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 13:35:00 -
[6]
I think we can conclude thus far that death to AFK cloakers is not anything like the reality these cowards like to portray. The issue seems to be with liars making up nonsense to support their desires.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 13:49:00 -
[7]
Cry all you like, the cloaker has to be there to bring in the 'green light'. no one here has been able to actually prove a situation where an afk cloaker has lead to their death therefore I conclude a lot of the neighing and braying about the SCOURGE of afk cloaking is a product of overactive paranoia and fantasy.
You can cry all you like but the minute you are presented with reasoning and a request for evidence you just harrumph and decide its unfair, without being able to indicate why.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:05:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Miss Rabblt
Originally by: Jemima Puddle****
i'm failed troll
well said bro
You are happy to stamp your feet about how terrible this all is but are unable to provide any proof, yet you are all over my thread trying to disrupt it. I am sorry to say that I am not trolling you. I am actually trying to gather some evidence that goes beyond the usual scope of the nerf afk cloaking threads. The fact that you are unable to do anything else but splerge the usual rhetoric and call anyone that opposes your small world view a troll just proves that YOU are in fact the one trolling.
I suggest you hop along now miss rabbit and go find another burrow to poop in.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:08:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Simetraz
Edited by: Simetraz on 19/08/2011 14:03:41
It is like talking to a wall.
What is the purpose of bringing a cloaked ship into a system and just sitting there.
To disrupt a systems usage.
A valid tactic, nobody disputes that.
The point is that an afk cloaker is the same thing as a BOT.
You are saying, yes I want to be able to do this job without being at the keyboard.
Nobody wants to remove the tactic they want to remove the BOT.
There is a difference and if you can't see it, well this whole discussion is over.
The mechanic is flawed and always has been.
Yet again, someone is incapable of providing any evidence of death to AFK cloaking but has to chip in with the same tired nonsense. I am reporting this post since you have proven either incapable, or belligerently defiant about disrupting my thread.
Go talk endlessly about this junk in some other thread, it has no place here.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:33:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Simetraz
AH but I did prove it.
By the very essence of my corp having to shift operations it had the same effect as a kill mail.
Now if I provided a kill mail wouldn't that prove that the person was actually NOT AFK.
So ANY kill mail could be null in voided by you.
Or are you going to except peoples words that they were killed by a afk cloaker ?
Originally by: Miss Rabblt
Originally by: Jemima Puddle****
I am sorry to say that I am not trolling you. I am actually trying to gather some evidence that goes beyond the usual scope of the nerf afk cloaking threads.
maybe when you start to read what others write to you you will find what you want. Now you only ignore completely anyone other's posts (except my). That's why i troll you.
One more try (last one): afk cloaking ITSELF isn't bad. And you are right: noone was really killed by afk cloaker (you can say the same about carriers: not one ship was killed by carrier, carriers use drones to make damage so not one carrier kills ships). Problem is how people use it.
This is like botting. Everyone says "bots kill the game". However bots don't kill anything. They just make their own function. And they indirectly hurt Eve. Which people see and complain about. You can say that people aren't just right and all this stuff. Will you?
Again, you are not discussing actual LOSSES to afk cloakers therefore are off topic. I have reported you both as such and urge you to find a more relevant thread to continue your theorising. There are plenty to choose from.
~~~
|
Jemima Puddlefuck
Caldari
In Praise Of Shadows
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 14:49:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Simetraz
Originally by: Jemima Puddle****
Again, you are not discussing actual LOSSES to afk cloakers therefore are off topic. I have reported you both as such and urge you to find a more relevant thread to continue your theorising. There are plenty to choose from.
You still haven't answered my question.
It's not my intention to argue semantics about AFK or not. We all know they can't kill you if they are AFK. I am simply using the (poorly worded) common name for this 'issue'. This isn't meant to be a trick thread, which makes it more frustrating that people can't hold their breath and count to 10 before splerging the same old rubbish in here.
Please go ahead.
~~~
|
| |
|